All of us are well aware that when performing CNC roughing, dynamic machining technology can be utilized to increase the efficiency of the CNC machining process.

You should decide what kind of tool you want to use: one with a large radius or one with a small radius.

With the use of a tool with a large radius, it is possible to reduce the height of the residual ridge and, as a result, to improve the surface quality of the surface being worked upon. The emergence of a new problem, however, is that many workpieces must be finished with narrow gaps, and large radius tools are unable to effectively handle these kinds of workpieces.

Does there a more efficient way of accomplishing the same task?

Is Medical CNC Machining possible to combine the advantages of the two while avoiding the drawbacks of each in a single solution that is both effective and efficient?

The answer to this question is an unequivocal affirmative.

Following a thorough investigation of the process by which the residual ridge height is formed, it is discovered that the residual ridge height is actually related to the arc radius of the contact point between the tool and the material, and that it has little to do with the radius of the tool itself (as had previously been assumed)The tool body's radius may be increased in some cases while the radius of the effective machining part of the tool remains constant, which may be sufficient to achieve the dual objectives of improving surface quality and shortening finishing time while remaining within a single stage of processing in some cases.

Following this development, some tool manufacturers have already begun research into the subject, resulting in the introduction of a variety of large radius arc tools to the market that are suitable for a variety of processing scenarios, including laser cutting.

The type of tool you want to use should be decided beforehand: a tool with a large radius or a tool with a small radius.

Because of the use of an aggressive tool with a large radius of curvature, it is possible to reduce the height of the residual ridge while simultaneously improving the texture and finish quality of the surface being worked on. An entirely new problem has emerged as a result of the fact that many workpieces must be finished with narrow gaps, and large radius tools are incapable of handling these types of workpieces effectively.

Is there a more efficient way of accomplishing the same task as previously mentioned?

CNC Medical Machining is possible to combine the advantages of the two, avoiding the disadvantages of each, to create an all-in-one solution that is both effective and efficient.

The answer to this question is a resounding affirmative in every way.

In the course of a thorough investigation into the process by which the residual ridge height is formed, it is discovered that the residual ridge height is actually related to the arc radius between the tool and the material, rather than the radius of the tool itself (as had been previously assumed). Increasing the radius of the tool body while keeping the radius of the effective machining part of the tool constant may be sufficient in some cases to achieve the dual objectives of improving surface quality and shortening finishing time while remaining within a single stage of processing, which may be sufficient for some applications.